局域网内postfix与exchange 2000互访的问题

由 bigsw 在 08-08-2003 13:18 发表:

局域网内postfix与exchange 2000互访的问题

在我的局域网内有两台mail服务器,一台用RH Linux7.3+postfix+bind搭建,另一台用windows 2k server+exchange 2k+dns搭建,它们各自提供各自的dns服务,且都有各自的公网IP(用NAT映射的)和域名。

现在的问题是,exchange的用户可以正常的收发email(包括局域网内部的postfix的user的),但postfix的用户却无法发给exchange的用户(发出去后,总是收到本地postmaster的退信),收没问题,收发其它公网上的email也没问题。应该是linux中的dns有问题,但我比较了win2k server与linux中的dns,没差别啊!

望高手指点!!


郁闷中.....学习中......


由 stanlogin 在 08-08-2003 15:34 发表:


退信内容是什么?还有mail.log里面有相关信息吗?


_____>小刀


由 bigsw 在 08-08-2003 17:08 发表:


stanlogin兄,你好

退信内容如下:

-----------------------------------------------------------

This is the Postfix program at host mail.sunway.8866.org.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned

below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.

For further assistance, please send mail to

 1<postmaster>   
 2  
 3  
 4  
 5If you do so, please include this problem report. You can   
 6  
 7delete your own text from the message returned below.   
 8  
 9  
10  
11The Postfix program   
12  
13  
14  
15<[email protected]>: host safq.net[192.168.10.21] said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to   
16  
17relay for [email protected]   
18  
19\-----------------------------------------------------------   
20  
21下面是我的网络的配置   
22  
23  
24  
25win2k server 192.168.10.21 上面有dns dhcp ad 服务,域名是safq.net,主机名是file-server.safq.net   
26  
27exchange server 192.168.10.22 只是用exchange起mail服务,主机名是mail.safq.net   
28  
29  
30  
31linux7.3 192.168.10.6 上面有dns postfix服务,主机名是master.sunway.8866.org   
32  
33  
34  
35由退信内容来看,应该是linux的dns设置出问题,但我实在不知道问题在哪里?   
36  
37  
38  
39sunway.8866.org.hosts   
40  
41\------------------------------------------------------------   
42  
43$ttl 38400   
44  
45sunway.8866.org. IN SOA master. root.localhost. (   
46  
471060156899   
48  
4910800   
50  
513600   
52  
53604800   
54  
5538400 )   
56  
57sunway.8866.org. IN NS master.   
58  
59master.sunway.8866.org. IN A 192</[email protected]></postmaster>
Published At
Categories with 服务器类
Tagged with
comments powered by Disqus